We all know what enhanced interrogation really means, we all
know that it isn’t something to be exactly happy about doing. No one wants to
have to water board another person after all. But it is ahistorical if she’s
trying to say the CIA and Military acted without the people’s approval to do
these things. I can say they had mine; my perspective was and is that those
individuals lost the right not to be interrogated the way they were when they
sided with the people who took away the right of 3000 people to have a peaceful
life on 9/11. But where is this woman going with this? What’s her end game?
Feinstein is dangerously close to being at Henry Kissinger
level, Kissinger in my eyes is a scavenger picking the carrion of our dead
soldiers and quenching his thirst on our living American warriors’ blood and
sweat. When people say things like what Diane did it’s to put people on the
defensive, that’s the whole goal but when I see things like this on instinct as
a gut reaction I go on the offense but before I speak I do my research and in
this case what I found was motive and precedence that could explain Diane’s
possibly ill guised actions. And I say ill guised because after you consider
another event that happened this week then you realize what is really going on
here.
Immediately if you are a conservative you’re thinking well
this is supposed to distract from the Gruber case, no it isn’t that’s not the
point. Everyone is still watching that and nothing will change regardless what
Diane says. While it may work as a boon for her party with a niche group of the
population the average American is more interested in what’s in their wallet
and Gruber’s case has been explained enough for us to not care what Congress
says to him, we expected the government to take action on the AHCA repeal with
or without Gruber, if they don’t there will be a constitutional crisis at a
level not seen since the years before the civil war.
But I digress Feinstein has a special interest and
as I mentioned before about bad policy crafting the second person needed to craft a bad
policy about what she intends is a useful idiot aka the person who
wants to do the right thing. The special interest is vested in her husband who is heavily
invested in Chinese firms and has scored in the past hundreds of millions of
dollars in contracts in part thanks to the hard work of his Mrs. Feinstein and
the tax payer to fund legislation that funnels money to those Chinese firms.
The event that happened this week was that Congress
completed a 1.1 Trillion dollar spending bill… The bill will be hated for now and
rightfully so because concessions were made after the voter had established a
mandate on Congress to act in reversal of the Democrats and Presidents agenda.
However it will be later lauded for having been fiscally responsible, that’s
just the ebb and flow of the news cycle. The issue for Diane and the reason for
her release is that the bill did not have a resolution in favor of China with
regards to IMF control. What the Chinese
wanted from the spending bill was for America to allow a governing board change
from 5 to 10 positions, presently there are 24 total so this would allow for
stronger representation by China and Russia in the IMF. The new top positions would then be appointed
by the current members and China, Russia and the olive branch Korea. -The focus
is on China reader, stay focused, Korea doesn’t matter because the Chinese can
exert military pressure on them to make favorable appointments- It wouldn’t be
the Chinese without a second distraction from the point of this power play and
the second distraction is that there would be a quota increase from developing
countries into the fund by 6% and a decrease 6% from the largest contributors.
The numbers stay around the same but the end result is China asserts an
incredible amount of control over the value of goods in America.
Either with forethought or out of sheer ignorance of the
depth of passing a spending bill with those concessions Republicans dodged the
bullet that would have sent and rightfully so every sensible American to grab
their fire arms once the fact that they essentially sold America sunk in.
Now I understand that this post has been rife with mention
of armed rebellion, but such is the state of the union. Diane Feinstein owes
Americans an apology for her inconsiderate march to profit. But I can’t hold it against her though, she’s
a politician, she isn’t interested in the truth; she’s interested in legacy and
wealth.
No comments:
Post a Comment